kafkatrap.info

This is a static website, with no interactive content, so no push notifications, cookies, etc. & so refresh the browser manually for any updated content if returning. I often set links to open in a new tab or window and I try to indicate that action in mouseover hover text. This page was last updated July 05, 2025.

This site is affiliated with my assetliving.news/ which exists in protest against Asset Living Property Management who knew it was unnecessary to abide by the state law, C.R.S. 38-12-903(4) which I quote on the website that I linked to at the beginning of this paragraph. (I understand that any evidence I attempt to provide to reinforce my accusation will be met with nothing but disdain since I don't seem to understand that I should just feel lucky that everyone I interact with who are being paid to do a job is kind enough to allow me to continue living ... uh, here (or whatever).

I also would like to quickly relay an anology to describe my situation with the purpose to dispel bias. If someone won a motorhome RV in a contest, raffle, or what-have-you, and there were, for all intents & purposes, permanent indications of the fact that the owner won the vehicle that are included in its structure, in the form of branding or other means. The indications can't be removed completely but are unnoticeable to a casual observer and only can be seen by mechanics doing work on it. It's assumed, of course, that the mechanics, being paid professionals, aren't going to give it a second thought as to how the vehicle came into the owner's legal possession ... their job is to do repair or maintenance and in their business paradigm, they can't afford to waste time investigating an owner in an attempt to prove that the owner shouldn't have received the vehicle. If the repair shop decided to refuse to release the RV back to the owner when the bill was settled (the owner paid the repair bill in full), and instead park the vehicle in their fenced in lot in an attempt to get the owner to "fess-up" & "admit" that they didn't deserve to win the vehicle & so it really isn't rightfully theirs, then the owner would have reason to go to police. It's theft, afterall. Whether the owner won the vehicle, inherited it, bought it, or is still buying it, isn't anybody's business as long as the owner has it legally registered, etc. The fact that the repair shop can't actually use the RV themselves, but just want to prevent the owner from enjoying it, is beside the point but yet there exists plausible deniability (hubris patronizing) since there could be feigned innocence because realistically the repair shop wouldn't be in the position to gain anything of value. There is still room for the repair shop to escalate into blatant theft by (staying true to this anology) dismantling the RV and selling off the parts.

With that context of a person owning a RV that is effectively stolen from them since they won it in a contest and the repair shop owner, the police, and people on Truth Social, all figure that the theft is justified since if the owner actually deserved the motorhome then nobody would be attempting to steal it. To make the anology more in line with my circumstances I'd have to alter the original source of the RV to being gov't (taxpayer) funded (and the taxpayers include deceased friends of mine) and instead of winning it in a contest it was awarded as part of a benefit package. Now the intricacies of that benefit package, how it came about & how I acquired it, is really nobody's business although I don't really keep it a secret. In this (ongoing) situation of being a recipient of gov't assisted housing and continuously being harassed by just about anyone who is being paid to do a job, instead of them just doing their work with maturity and professionalism, I realized that to advocate for myself I end up compromising my privacy. I knew that from the beginning (see: missionrock.net) but I always figured that eventually I'd be validated in a way to where I felt it was satisfactorily resolved (enough) to where I could remove sensitive information about myself from the world wide web. I also assumed that I wouldn't continue to be harassed since I never was insisting that I was owed money from the property managers or owners, or anyone else for that matter, & I was (obviously) only wanting to dispel bias and create awareness as to what people who worked for multi-million dollar corportations (which are based out of state) would end up doing in their lack of competance and ethics. I have to keep in mind that the majority of people are from a different state and so they can't help but to defend other people from out of state (& in summer of 1925 the Denver mayor invited the NAACP to the city to hold their convention ... One of my social media connections works for the NAACP, so there's that too).

At this time I've also received another benefit in the form of a guaranteed spot in a national cemetary by Veterans Affairs. So in other words my federal government considers me to be repectful & honorable enough to be buried along side war heros. Now I have local police trying to work out what their take would be on the $200 that a corporation stole from me... well, nothing is their cut so I should be able to understand why it'd be too much of an inconvenience for them to actually entertain the idea that the money was stolen from me and not somehow owed to that woman sitting in her house in Texas (or wherever) who I spoke with on the telephone. I'm not supposed to perceive it as "wire fraud" since in the course of her hard work dealing with low class people like me she's bound to make an error but it's really up to me on how to go about properly appealing to the people working for these property management corportations since they're the bourgeoisie culture and very sensitive to confrontations regarding their moral ineptitude. There only seems to be me having any problem and so I just must need to be taught that I don't understand that I'm a privleged ingrate ... I started working before I was out of high school & worked in construction & other work that was strenuous & dangerous that most people would refuse to do. I went to work into construction plumbing with a reconstructed ankle (my military discharge document has notation that I'm physically disabled) because there wasn't anything else readily available for me to do that paid reasonably. I shared houses, apartments, and lived with family, and even lived in residential facilities for disadvantaged people. I've helped people with money and labor, etc. and my family loves me. The idea of the property managers is to humiliate me & degrade me & force me to give up my housing assistance (somehow) and if anyone says that's not true & I'm only being paranoid then what exactly is their endgame?

I also understand the cultural posit that I shouldn't be complaining to anyone since there are anti-discrimination laws to protect people that are meant to be protected with anti-discrimination laws. The U.S. Constitution Fourteenth Amendment guarantees equal protection of law and so if I feel like anyone is committing some crime against me then I shouldn't pay it no mind since if all of that related to me in my circumstances then someone would have put a stop to it (or something). I'm a disabled person under U.S. federal law since I receive disability benefits (and I can print off a document from ssa.gov that states I'm a disabled person) and the property managers who I have problems with know that and disabled people are, in fact, discriminated against and are a protected class in our country and so that includes me ... now, I understand that I don't appear disabled and I don't expect people to know I am ... it's usually not an issue for me ... but my doing well physically shouldn't be held against me as some sort of proof that I'm just weak or whatever. I've had people with masters degrees & doctorates talk to me extensively about things that can happen to people in my demographic by abusive people. It just so happens that there seems to be consensus, regarding people in the demographic of what the Social Security Administration refers to as "mentally impaired", that we must deserve to be treated like dirt, lied to, stolen from, mocked, patronized, etc., since we're bound to break down and cry or somethiong really funny like that and people can get a video recording and upload it to YouTube & be paid for their (lack of honest) effort.

I also would like to clarify here that I know that because I have a beard that people "can't help but assume" that I don't understand that I look like a homeless P.O.S. to them and that should concern me since there's a problem with vigilantes attacking homeless people ... and if somebody ends up on the streets then it's their own fault since it doesn't happen to everybody (or whatever). Rest assured that I was taught as a young man that I was inevitably going to "look like" somebody that's bad in some way. If I was all clean shaven or had my beard all perfectly trimmed then I'd look like a serial killer or that police sketch of the current bike path rapist (or whoever). I've had plenty of people hate me for looking like an average man. (I have the details of the transaction with Asset Living Property Management where they're refusing to refund my two bills below this line but commented out so it can only be seen in the HTML source of the page.)